One in twenty HR job ads requires AI skill. Fewer than one in five mention it.
Every ad returned by five defined HR role-title searches on LinkedIn across the United States and 20 European countries, posted in the seven days to 2 August 2026. Repeat postings and openings carried under two titles are counted once, leaving 3,350 distinct ads. Every match was read in full and classified by how the ad uses AI.
0.0%
make AI a hard requirement
0.0%
ask for it as a skill
0.0%
mention AI in relation to the role or employer
Each figure contains the one to its left. Of the 9.5% that ask for AI skill,
5.4 points require it and 4.1 points call it a merit.
hrjobs.fullstackhr.io · FullStack HR · 3,350 HR job ads, seven days to 2 August 2026
Scroll
The short version
One in twenty HR job ads makes AI a hard requirement, 180 of 3,350, or 5.4%. A further 4.1% call it a merit rather than a requirement, so 9.5% ask for the skill in some form. 18.5% mention AI in relation to the role or the employer. Each figure contains the one before it, and close to half of that talk, 304 of 621 mentions, places no expectation on the candidate at all.
European ads mention AI more often than American ones, 20.8% against 16.9%. The gap narrows to 10.2% against 8.9% for asking the candidate to have the skill, and on hard requirements the two are level, 5.1% against 5.5%. Learning and development asks most often at 12.9%, though its lead over recruiters and business partners sits inside the margin of error.
Where ads name the skill, they mean the everyday assistants, Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot and Gemini, applied to the profession's own workflow. Machine-learning depth appears in 1.4% of the 419 coded ads.
0
distinct HR job ads analysed
0
mention AI, 18.5% of all ads
0
ask the candidate for AI skill, 9.5%
0
make it a hard requirement, 5.4%
Bars are drawn to the real share, so the drop is to scale.
01
Part 1
How much AI is in HR hiring
Whether ads mention AI at all, and how much of that talk places any expectation on the candidate.
Who talks and who asks
The gold bar is the share of each family's ads that mention AI anywhere. The teal bar is the share that make it a hard requirement, and the orange bar the share that call it a merit. Teal and orange together are the ads that ask for the skill at all, and both sit inside the gold. Learning and development requires it most, generalists and specialists least, and what is left when teal and orange are taken out of the gold is employer talk that expects nothing of the candidate. Hover a family for the counts.
Mentions AIHard requirementMerit
All three on the same 0 to 40% scale
Base all ads in the family. A family's 100% is every HR ad of that kind, whether or not it says a word about AI. The next chart uses a different base, so its percentages are larger.
Mentions AI% of all ads in the family
Hard requirement% of all ads in the family
Merit% of all ads in the family
Recruiters1,028 ads
Mentions
0.0%
Requires
0.0%
Merit
0.0%
Recruiters · 1,028 ads, and every share below is measured against all 1,028. 246 mention AI, 23.9%. 59 make it a hard requirement, 5.7%. 46 call it a merit, 4.5%. The remaining 141 of the mentions place no expectation on the candidate.
Learning & development487 ads
Mentions
0.0%
Requires
0.0%
Merit
0.0%
Learning & development · 487 ads, and every share below is measured against all 487. 99 mention AI, 20.3%. 36 make it a hard requirement, 7.4%. 27 call it a merit, 5.5%. The remaining 36 of the mentions place no expectation on the candidate.
HR leadership232 ads
Mentions
0.0%
Requires
0.0%
Merit
0.0%
HR leadership · 232 ads, and every share below is measured against all 232. 49 mention AI, 21.1%. 14 make it a hard requirement, 6.0%. 9 call it a merit, 3.9%. The remaining 26 of the mentions place no expectation on the candidate.
HR business partners724 ads
Mentions
0.0%
Requires
0.0%
Merit
0.0%
HR business partners · 724 ads, and every share below is measured against all 724. 131 mention AI, 18.1%. 39 make it a hard requirement, 5.4%. 35 call it a merit, 4.8%. The remaining 57 of the mentions place no expectation on the candidate.
Generalists & specialists879 ads
Mentions
0.0%
Requires
0.0%
Merit
0.0%
Generalists & specialists · 879 ads, and every share below is measured against all 879. 96 mention AI, 10.9%. 32 make it a hard requirement, 3.6%. 20 call it a merit, 2.3%. The remaining 44 of the mentions place no expectation on the candidate.
All families3,350 ads
Mentions
0.0%
Requires
0.0%
Merit
0.0%
All families · 3,350 ads, and every share below is measured against all 3,350. 621 mention AI, 18.5%. 180 make it a hard requirement, 5.4%. 137 call it a merit, 4.1%. The remaining 304 of the mentions place no expectation on the candidate.
hrjobs.fullstackhr.io · FullStack HR
What the AI mentions are made of
Each family's AI mentions broken down by type. The recruiter bar is the most diluted, 96 of its 246 mentions are about the employer rather than the candidate. The L&D bar is the densest in real expectations.
Base only the ads that mention AI. Each bar is that family's AI mentions and nothing else, so every bar is 100% wide. Recruiters read 24% required here and 5.7% in the chart above from the same 59 ads, because 59 of 246 mentions is not 59 of 1,033 ads.
Recruiters
24%
19%
17%
39%
0 mentions = 100%
Recruiters · 246 AI mentions, and this bar divides those 246 rather than all 1,028 ads in the family. required skill 59 (24%), preferred skill 46 (19%), the job uses ai 41 (17%), about the employer 96 (39%), hiring for ai roles 4 (2%).
Learning & development
36%
27%
15%
21%
0 mentions = 100%
Learning & development · 99 AI mentions, and this bar divides those 99 rather than all 487 ads in the family. required skill 36 (36%), preferred skill 27 (27%), the job uses ai 15 (15%), about the employer 21 (21%).
HR leadership
29%
18%
18%
35%
0 mentions = 100%
HR leadership · 49 AI mentions, and this bar divides those 49 rather than all 232 ads in the family. required skill 14 (29%), preferred skill 9 (18%), the job uses ai 9 (18%), about the employer 17 (35%).
HR business partners
30%
27%
15%
29%
0 mentions = 100%
HR business partners · 131 AI mentions, and this bar divides those 131 rather than all 724 ads in the family. required skill 39 (30%), preferred skill 35 (27%), the job uses ai 19 (15%), about the employer 38 (29%).
Generalists & specialists
33%
21%
19%
27%
0 mentions = 100%
Generalists & specialists · 96 AI mentions, and this bar divides those 96 rather than all 879 ads in the family. required skill 32 (33%), preferred skill 20 (21%), the job uses ai 18 (19%), about the employer 26 (27%).
A further 73 ads are excluded from every figure on this page because AI appears only in legal boilerplate about the application process, typically a line stating whether AI screens applications. That says something about legal departments and nothing about the job. The split was 23 recruiter ads, 17 generalist, 16 L&D, 15 business partner and 2 leadership.
hrjobs.fullstackhr.io · FullStack HR
02
Part 2
What the skill means in practice
The 419 ads that ask for AI skill, or where the job itself uses AI, coded by capability, phrasing and named tools.
What they want you to be able to do
Coded against a fixed capability taxonomy. An ad can ask for more than one. Read down a column to see a profession's profile, across a row to see who wants that capability. Hover any cell for the counts.
Base the coded ads in each column, the count under each column head. An ad can carry several capabilities, so a column does not add up to 100%. These are not shares of all ads and do not compare with the figures earlier on the page.
Recruitersn=146
L&Dn=78
Leadershipn=32
Business partnersn=93
Generalistsn=70
All families419 coded ads
AI inside the core workflow61% overall
64%
Recruiters · AI inside the core workflow · 64.4% of 146 coded ads
74%
Learning & development · AI inside the core workflow · 74.4% of 78 coded ads
41%
HR leadership · AI inside the core workflow · 40.6% of 32 coded ads
44%
HR business partners · AI inside the core workflow · 44.1% of 93 coded ads
70%
Generalists & specialists · AI inside the core workflow · 70.0% of 70 coded ads
61%
All families · AI inside the core workflow · 60.9% of 419 coded ads
Everyday AI tool fluency41% overall
35%
Recruiters · Everyday AI tool fluency · 34.9% of 146 coded ads
38%
Learning & development · Everyday AI tool fluency · 38.5% of 78 coded ads
34%
HR leadership · Everyday AI tool fluency · 34.4% of 32 coded ads
43%
HR business partners · Everyday AI tool fluency · 43.0% of 93 coded ads
53%
Generalists & specialists · Everyday AI tool fluency · 52.9% of 70 coded ads
40%
All families · Everyday AI tool fluency · 40.3% of 419 coded ads
Analytics and insight with AI25% overall
22%
Recruiters · Analytics and insight with AI · 21.9% of 146 coded ads
17%
Learning & development · Analytics and insight with AI · 16.7% of 78 coded ads
22%
HR leadership · Analytics and insight with AI · 21.9% of 32 coded ads
47%
HR business partners · Analytics and insight with AI · 47.3% of 93 coded ads
14%
Generalists & specialists · Analytics and insight with AI · 14.3% of 70 coded ads
25%
All families · Analytics and insight with AI · 25.3% of 419 coded ads
Building automations and agents20% overall
17%
Recruiters · Building automations and agents · 17.1% of 146 coded ads
10%
Learning & development · Building automations and agents · 10.3% of 78 coded ads
16%
HR leadership · Building automations and agents · 15.6% of 32 coded ads
17%
HR business partners · Building automations and agents · 17.2% of 93 coded ads
46%
Generalists & specialists · Building automations and agents · 45.7% of 70 coded ads
21%
All families · Building automations and agents · 20.5% of 419 coded ads
Leading AI adoption13% overall
8%
Recruiters · Leading AI adoption · 8.2% of 146 coded ads
10%
Learning & development · Leading AI adoption · 10.3% of 78 coded ads
41%
HR leadership · Leading AI adoption · 40.6% of 32 coded ads
17%
HR business partners · Leading AI adoption · 17.2% of 93 coded ads
10%
Generalists & specialists · Leading AI adoption · 10.0% of 70 coded ads
13%
All families · Leading AI adoption · 13.4% of 419 coded ads
Teaching AI to others13% overall
5%
Recruiters · Teaching AI to others · 4.8% of 146 coded ads
26%
Learning & development · Teaching AI to others · 25.6% of 78 coded ads
9%
HR leadership · Teaching AI to others · 9.4% of 32 coded ads
23%
HR business partners · Teaching AI to others · 22.6% of 93 coded ads
4%
Generalists & specialists · Teaching AI to others · 4.3% of 70 coded ads
13%
All families · Teaching AI to others · 12.9% of 419 coded ads
Responsible and lawful AI6% overall
6%
Recruiters · Responsible and lawful AI · 6.2% of 146 coded ads
1%
Learning & development · Responsible and lawful AI · 1.3% of 78 coded ads
12%
HR leadership · Responsible and lawful AI · 12.5% of 32 coded ads
5%
HR business partners · Responsible and lawful AI · 5.4% of 93 coded ads
6%
Generalists & specialists · Responsible and lawful AI · 5.7% of 70 coded ads
5%
All families · Responsible and lawful AI · 5.5% of 419 coded ads
All families · Curiosity only, nothing concrete · 9.1% of 419 coded ads
Scroll the table sideways to see every role →
hrjobs.fullstackhr.io · FullStack HR
The same word, five different jobs
The most common way each profession phrases the ability it wants, summarised from the ads. Recruiters want AI pointed at the funnel, L&D wants it pointed at content and at teaching others, generalists want their manual work to disappear, and leadership wants someone who can run the change.
Recruiters
use ai to improve recruitingsource candidates with ai toolsuse ai to improve sourcinguse ai across the hiring processsource and screen candidates with ai
Learning & development
train customers on ai softwaretrain employees to use aibuild ai-enabled learning platformsuse ai to design learningroll out ai literacy across workforce
HR leadership
apply ai to executive support workbe proficient with ai assistantslead ai-enabled hr operating modelevaluate and adopt ai hr toolsapply ai to rethink operations
HR business partners
embed ai in hr service deliverylead team use of ai analyticsstay curious about ai toolsuse ai to solve people problemsguide leaders through ai adoption
Generalists & specialists
use ai tools dailyautomate people reporting with aicut manual hr work with aiuse ai assistants in hr workapply ai to hr processes
Which AI products get named
AI products named in the 419 coded ads, the ones that ask for AI skill or where the job itself uses AI. HR systems like Workday and Greenhouse are excluded, since ads name them as the platform the work sits in rather than as AI skill. The two columns count different things. Named products counts the tools an ad names across those 419 ads. Generic terms counts the vocabulary used across all 621 ads that mention AI, which is why Claude reads 26 on the left and 20 on the right. The four general assistants dominate, and the HR-specific AI tools barely register. Employers expect fluency with the same assistants everyone else uses, not with a niche HR stack.
Named products
Claude
26
ChatGPT
20
Copilot
16
Gemini
14
Metaview
3
SeekOut
2
Juicebox
2
Paradox
2
Writer
1
TensorFlow
1
Generic terms
AI agents
36
Machine learning
30
Generative AI
21
Claude
20
ChatGPT
18
Intelligence artificielle
15
Microsoft Copilot
14
AI-native
13
Künstliche Intelligenz
13
Gemini
11
AI fluency
8
LLM
7
AI/ML
7
AI-enabled tools
7
AI tools
6
Artificial intelligence
5
hrjobs.fullstackhr.io · FullStack HR
Four ads that make the point
One from each of the four families that ask for AI skill most often, all of them hard requirements. The full set of 621 AI-mentioning ads, filterable by role and by how AI is mentioned, sits on its own page.
Required skillL&DUnited States
Sorren
Learning and Development Leader
The right candidate uses AI and data to accelerate design, improve access, and drive better outcomes, while applying strong judgment about accuracy, applicability, and where human expertise matters most.
Product Director, Talent Acquisition and People Development
Previous experience moving products beyond incremental improvement to reimagine end-to-end journeys, using technology, automation and AI where appropriate to improve speed, quality and user experience.
Ability to use HR data, workforce analytics, HRIS platforms, AI-enabled insights, and business metrics to influence decisions while protecting employee privacy and ensuring appropriate governance.
Experience leading in a data-rich, AI-enabled environment, using analytics and digital tools to support sound decisions, strengthen workforce outcomes, and promote responsible innovation.
Measured on demand rather than talk, the gap is small. 10.3% of European ads ask the candidate for AI skill against 9.0% of American ones, and on hard requirements alone the two are level, 5.5% in the United States against 5.2% in Europe. Business partners are the clearest American lead. The large European figure for learning and development rests on 75 ads, so read it with that in mind.
United StatesEurope
Same 0 to 40% scale as the family chart
Bar asks the candidate for AI skill, hard requirement or merit. Merely mentioning AI is not demand, so this chart leaves it out. The smaller figure under each bar is the hard requirement on its own. Base is that role's ads in that region, the counts under each label.
Recruiters419 US · 609 EU ads
US
0.0%6.0% hard
EU
0.0%5.6% hard
Recruiters. United States 44 of 419 ads ask for the skill, 25 as a hard requirement. Europe 61 of 609 ads ask, 34 as a hard requirement.
Learning & development413 US · 74 EU ads
US
0.0%6.8% hard
EU
0.0%10.8% hard
Learning & development. United States 42 of 413 ads ask for the skill, 28 as a hard requirement. Europe 21 of 74 ads ask, 8 as a hard requirement.
HR leadership166 US · 66 EU ads
US
0.0%6.0% hard
EU
0.0%6.1% hard
HR leadership. United States 16 of 166 ads ask for the skill, 10 as a hard requirement. Europe 7 of 66 ads ask, 4 as a hard requirement.
HR business partners397 US · 327 EU ads
US
0.0%6.8% hard
EU
0.0%3.7% hard
HR business partners. United States 48 of 397 ads ask for the skill, 27 as a hard requirement. Europe 26 of 327 ads ask, 12 as a hard requirement.
Generalists & specialists572 US · 307 EU ads
US
0.0%3.3% hard
EU
0.0%4.2% hard
Generalists & specialists. United States 26 of 572 ads ask for the skill, 19 as a hard requirement. Europe 26 of 307 ads ask, 13 as a hard requirement.
0%10%20%30%40%
hrjobs.fullstackhr.io · FullStack HR
Country by country
All five families pooled. Countries with at least 20 ads in the window. France, the United Kingdom, Poland and Spain form a top cluster at around a quarter to a third of ads, well above the United States. Italy, Belgium and Austria sit below one in ten. Read the order as a snapshot rather than a stable ranking. Only the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany carry enough ads for a narrow interval, while France reads 32.5% with a 95% interval of 23 to 43. The orange inner bar is the share that asks for AI skill. Faded rows have fewer than forty ads and are indicative only.
Full bar: mentions AI · orange part: asks for the skill
Base all ads in that country, the count under each country name. The orange part sits inside the full bar rather than beside it, so a country that mentions AI in 33% of its ads asks for the skill in fewer than 33%.
01
France80 ads
32%23–43
France · 26 of 80 ads mention AI (32.5%), and 11 ask for the skill (13.8%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 23% and 43% with 95% confidence.
02
United Kingdom416 ads
28%24–32
United Kingdom · 116 of 416 ads mention AI (27.9%), and 59 ask for the skill (14.2%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 24% and 32% with 95% confidence.
03
Poland52 ads
27%17–40
Poland · 14 of 52 ads mention AI (26.9%), and 4 ask for the skill (7.7%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 17% and 40% with 95% confidence.
04
Spain86 ads
26%18–36
Spain · 22 of 86 ads mention AI (25.6%), and 12 ask for the skill (14.0%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 18% and 36% with 95% confidence.
05
Germany219 ads
20%15–26
Germany · 44 of 219 ads mention AI (20.1%), and 27 ask for the skill (12.3%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 15% and 26% with 95% confidence.
06
Portugal47 ads
19%10–33
Portugal · 9 of 47 ads mention AI (19.1%), and 2 ask for the skill (4.3%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 10% and 33% with 95% confidence.
07
United States1,967 ads
17%15–19
United States · 333 of 1,967 ads mention AI (16.9%), and 176 ask for the skill (8.9%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 15% and 19% with 95% confidence.
08
Ireland35 ads
14%6–29
Ireland · 5 of 35 ads mention AI (14.3%), and 3 ask for the skill (8.6%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 6% and 29% with 95% confidence. Small base, read with care.
09
Sweden22 ads
14%5–33
Sweden · 3 of 22 ads mention AI (13.6%), and 1 ask for the skill (4.5%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 5% and 33% with 95% confidence. Small base, read with care.
10
Switzerland43 ads
12%5–24
Switzerland · 5 of 43 ads mention AI (11.6%), and 2 ask for the skill (4.7%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 5% and 24% with 95% confidence.
11
Netherlands104 ads
12%7–19
Netherlands · 12 of 104 ads mention AI (11.5%), and 6 ask for the skill (5.8%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 7% and 19% with 95% confidence.
12
Greece28 ads
11%4–27
Greece · 3 of 28 ads mention AI (10.7%), and 1 ask for the skill (3.6%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 4% and 27% with 95% confidence. Small base, read with care.
13
Romania29 ads
10%4–26
Romania · 3 of 29 ads mention AI (10.3%), and 2 ask for the skill (6.9%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 4% and 26% with 95% confidence. Small base, read with care.
14
Italy78 ads
9%4–17
Italy · 7 of 78 ads mention AI (9.0%), and 1 ask for the skill (1.3%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 4% and 17% with 95% confidence.
15
Belgium58 ads
7%3–16
Belgium · 4 of 58 ads mention AI (6.9%), and 2 ask for the skill (3.4%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 3% and 16% with 95% confidence.
16
Austria30 ads
7%2–21
Austria · 2 of 30 ads mention AI (6.7%), and 2 ask for the skill (6.7%). On this many ads the true share sits somewhere between 2% and 21% with 95% confidence. Small base, read with care.
0%10%20%30%40%
Every country as a table
Country
Ads
Mention AI
Share
95% interval
Ask for the skill
France
80
26
32.5%
23–43%
11
United Kingdom
416
116
27.9%
24–32%
59
Poland
52
14
26.9%
17–40%
4
Spain
86
22
25.6%
18–36%
12
Germany
219
44
20.1%
15–26%
27
Portugal
47
9
19.1%
10–33%
2
United States
1,967
333
16.9%
15–19%
176
Ireland
35
5
14.3%
6–29%
3
Sweden
22
3
13.6%
5–33%
1
Switzerland
43
5
11.6%
5–24%
2
Netherlands
104
12
11.5%
7–19%
6
Greece
28
3
10.7%
4–27%
1
Romania
29
3
10.3%
4–26%
2
Italy
78
7
9.0%
4–17%
1
Belgium
58
4
6.9%
3–16%
2
Austria
30
2
6.7%
2–21%
2
hrjobs.fullstackhr.io · FullStack HR
Method and caveats
Source. LinkedIn job listings pulled on 2 and 3 August 2026 in Central European Summer Time, covering ads LinkedIn reported as posted in the preceding seven days, so the window runs from 27 July to 3 August 2026. See the note on the two sources below.
Role families. HR leadership covers CHRO, Chief People Officer, VP HR, VP People, Head of HR, Head of People and HR Director. Business partners cover HR Business Partner, HRBP, People Partner and People Business Partner. Generalists cover HR Generalist, HR Specialist, People Operations, HR Advisor and HR Officer. Recruiters cover Recruiter, Talent Acquisition in all its variants and Sourcer. Learning and development covers Learning & Development, Instructional Designer, Training Manager, Training Specialist and Talent Development. Where a title names two families, for instance Talent Acquisition & HR Business Partner, the family whose words come first in the title takes the ad, and the ad is counted once.
Two sources. The three HR families were pulled from LinkedIn's job index through the Apify actor fantastic-jobs/advanced-linkedin-job-search-api, which offers a server-side full-text filter and a built-in staffing-agency exclusion. Recruiters and learning and development were pulled later, through Monid's LinkedIn job search, because the first source had hit its monthly quota. That second source has no agency filter, so agencies were removed here by employer name and industry, which is a blunter instrument. It also has no server-side text filter, so the full ad body was pulled and matched locally against the AI term list before classification. Treat comparisons between the two groups as directional rather than exact, particularly for recruiters, where residual agency listings are the likeliest source of error.
Geography. The United States plus the United Kingdom, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Spain, Italy, Ireland, Belgium, Poland, Switzerland, Austria, Portugal, Czechia, Romania, Hungary and Greece.
Duplicates are gone. Employers routinely publish the same opening across many locations, and LinkedIn sometimes returns one posting under two different titles. Rows are collapsed first on the LinkedIn posting id and then on employer, title and country, which leaves 3,350 distinct ads. Where one posting had been coded twice, the stronger claim on the candidate is the one kept. Every number on this page counts an opening once, no matter how many times LinkedIn carried it or under how many titles.
Why seven days. Seven days answers the question of what is live right now, in one clean snapshot. A thirty-day pull would cost roughly four times as much, mix expired ads with live ones, and change the shares very little.
Detection runs in sixteen languages. Every one of the 3,350 ad bodies was matched locally against an AI vocabulary covering English, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, Finnish, Polish, Czech, Romanian, Hungarian and Greek, including the acronyms KI, IA and AI, and the named assistants. Acronyms are matched case-sensitively and only in the language regions where they mean artificial intelligence, which keeps the Italian preposition "ai" and the French "j'ai" out. That pass recovered 43 ads the original English-only search had missed, concentrated in Germany, France and Spain.
Classification. Every match was read in its entirety and classified against a fixed category set, then quality-checked in an independent pass that verified each quote appears verbatim in the original and that the category holds. A further 73 ads were set aside as application-process boilerplate, and thirty-five matches were discarded as false positives, among them the Italian preposition "ai", the French "j'ai", company codes containing IA, scraped page furniture, and the string "anthropic" hiding inside "philanthropic".
Where the numbers still strain. The language gap is closed but two limits remain. Countries below roughly forty ads, Ireland, Austria, Romania, Greece and Sweden, carry wide error bars and should be read as directional rather than precise. And an ad that gestures at AI without naming it in any of the sixteen languages, for instance by describing automation or intelligent tooling in the abstract, is still invisible to this method. The United States, the United Kingdom and Germany are the three steadiest series.
Take the data
Every number on this page, plus the underlying ads, as one markdown file. Open it in any editor, drop it into a spreadsheet, or hand it to a model and ask your own questions of it.
The full dataset
Every summary table on this page, from role families to the capability matrix
All 621 AI-mentioning ads with employer, role, country, mention type, verbatim quote and link
An appendix with the full base of 3,350 ads, so you can rebuild any share yourself
Markdown, 613 KB. Free to reuse with a link back to this page.